Phenomenology Of Religion

[Name][Institution][Instructor][Course] : Jean Luc MarionMarion s Theology and MetaphysicsWhat Marion seeks to combat most on the theological terrain is what he calls the flawlessness a false image or conceit of paragon . He identifies various forms of n one(a)suchatry , job with the visual and moving on to the conceptual . Metaphysics , far from organism the proper form of theological system , is merely one such(prenominal) transformation of idolatry . Marion is convinced that theology has been far overly engrossed up in metaphysics and can only lettuce from its destruction . He shows how the end of metaphysics , as pronounced by Nietzsche , coincides with the disqualification of the metaphysical idol of matinee idol , the definition of perfection as causa sui (or the clean God . He examines both Nietzsche and Holder lin as stages on the agency to a less idolatrous persuasion of GodYet Marion seeks to think non just the destruction of the moral idol of God that is accomplish by Nietzsche , but beyond that he wants to cede theology from the highest and most difficult idolatry , that of Heidegger s concept of existence . Heidegger , for Marion , frame inscribed within metaphysics , although he in addition serves as a pointer for a way beyond it . Marion then seeks to outwit Heidegger at his own game , to free God from the idolatry of Being and to open a runway to thinking God as icon , which he suggests is accomplished in the fancy of the gift or of charity . His process is the chase . It is , branch a c beful investigation into restrictions , boundaries , and limitations , and arcsecond , an exploit to transgress such limits once they have been defined .

nonpareil and standoffishness follows a rather systematic data rail of progression in thinking a distance former(a) or beyond ontological difference , while God Without Being , is essentially collections of s that further emphasize and give section various parts of the essential arguments of this first runIdol and blank blank space seeks to muster in and make possible a popular opinion of distance , where the substance of distance emerges only slowly through and through the study itself . It refers , first , to the distance within Godself , the Trinitarian play at the center of Christian theology , the relation of the Son to the tyro which the introduction claims already traverses and desolates metaphysics . The attempt to overcome metaphysics is central to this work . Me taphysics is defined by idolatry , especially by that of onto-theo-logy . Marion argues that one can let loose of God only in terms of distance . Distance thus , second , refers overly to the relation between cosmos and God , to a reliable paradox of withdrawal and approaching nearness and distance which solely makes an encounter with God possibleOnly God s infinity engages beyond ontology and cause , only God s incomprehensibility escapes epistemology . Distance designates both infinity and incomprehensibility and go out ultimately emerge as much radical than ontological difference (Heidegger ) and differance (Derrida . Marion s theological form of distance , and specifically his thought of God , then , are asserted to be more successful than all interpret philosophical transgressions...If you want to get a full essay, site it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap ! essay